Call for Participation

Submit to CHIWork 2026

Join a community of researchers and practitioners mapping responsible AI use in HCI—and co-authoring a professional code of conduct for the GenAI era.

How to Submit ↓

About the workshop

As Generative AI (GenAI) embeds into HCI workflows, balancing efficiency with accountability is critical. The “vibe coding” era and AI-assisted analysis have widened the “accountability gap.” This half-day hybrid workshop at CHIWork 2026 in Linz, Austria seeks to professionalize GenAI-augmented workers by defining ethical “co-thinking,” shifting beyond simple disclosure toward intellectual autonomy.

We welcome both academic researchers with position papers and industry/HCI practitioners with AI disclosure statements. The workshop is designed as a safe, reflexive space where participants can openly share negative experiences, AI fatigue, and moments of ethical friction.

Key deadlines

DateMilestone
May 15, 2026 Submission deadline — Track 1 & Track 2 (AoE)
May 25, 2026 Acceptance notifications
June 22, 2026 (Monday) Workshop day — CHIWork 2026, Linz, Austria

All deadlines are Anywhere on Earth (AoE).

Two ways to participate

Track 1
Position Papers

For researchers who want to present their work and contribute to a peer-reviewed proceedings. Papers should explore accountability, tool critique, AI dependency, de-skilling, or responsible practice in HCI workflows.

  • Up to 4 pages including references
  • ACM Manuscript Template (CHIWork format)
  • Light peer review by the organizing committee
  • Published open-access on arXiv (no separate proceedings server)
  • arXiv submission required after acceptance (see instructions below)
  • 5-minute lightning talk + 3 slides at the workshop
Track 2
AI Disclosure Statements

For industry professionals, CHI practitioners, and researchers who want to reflect on and share their personal GenAI use. No prior research required—lived experience is the contribution. A short paragraph is enough; our framework is there if you want to go deeper.

  • 1 page or a short paragraph
  • Free format — no template required
  • Extended framework available as a guide (see below)
  • Selected for depth and reflexivity
  • Publicly shared and discussed at the workshop
Templates

Submission Templates

We provide pre-configured templates for both tracks. Use the Overleaf template to get started immediately, or download the GitHub repo if you prefer to work locally.

arXiv submission

All accepted Track 1 position papers will be published on arXiv—this is our open-access proceedings. The Overleaf template already includes a workshop identification header that will appear in your compiled PDF.

After uploading to arXiv, please email the lead facilitator with your arXiv link so we can list it on the Accepted Papers page.

AI Use Statement Framework

While Track 2 participants are free to structure their disclosures as they see fit, we provide the following thematic framework to guide reflexive accounts of GenAI integration. Move beyond simple disclosure toward a deep reflection of agency, accountability, and “co-thinking.”

Part A — HCI Research & Design Cycle

Characterize your GenAI usage across these phases of HCI work:

  • Planning & Literature Review
    e.g., finding papers, summarizing themes
  • Prototyping & Design
    e.g., wireframing, vibe coding, asset generation
  • Data Collection & Synthesis
    e.g., transcript coding, persona creation
  • Analysis & Coding
    e.g., system prototyping, quantitative analysis
  • Dissemination & Communication
    e.g., manuscript writing, presentations
Part B — Thematic Reflection Areas
  • Agency and Originality
    How do you maintain status as the primary “arbiter” of the final design? Have you noticed shifts in professional identity?
  • Co-Thinking in Development
    Which tasks have you delegated to AI, and which have you reclaimed for “deep work?”
  • Empathy and Quality Integrity
    Describe a specific instance where AI-driven acceleration felt at odds with qualitative depth. How did you verify rigor?
  • Resistance and Re-imagining
    Where have you intentionally rejected AI use for ethical or professional reasons?
  • Professional Policies & Boundaries
    How do institutional standards shape your practice? When do you choose to STOP?
Track 2 Template

AI Disclosure Statement Template

A structured template for Track 2 is included in the Overleaf project. You may also submit in any readable format (PDF, Word, plain text).

Submission process

The organizing committee will review submissions for thematic fit, reflexivity, and contribution to workshop discussion.

  1. Prepare your submission using the appropriate template above.
  2. Export your paper as a PDF.
  3. Submit via the Google Form below (link will appear when submissions open).
  4. Track 1 authors: also submit to arXiv after acceptance (see instructions above).

Submission portal opening soon

The Google Form for submissions will open once deadlines are confirmed. Check back here or contact hgs52@cornell.edu for updates.

Attendance & registration

CHIWork registration is required to attend the workshop. All participants must register for CHIWork 2026 via the official conference registration system. You may choose full-conference or one-day registration.

In-person capacity is capped at 25 participants (venue constraint). Remote/hybrid participation is supported: we will provide Zoom access and ensure remote attendees can fully engage via shared notes and moderated discussion. Mohammed Almutairi coordinates our remote track.

Modality: The workshop is primarily in-person (Linz, Austria), with a dedicated remote cohort. Joining instructions for remote participants will be shared with accepted attendees at least one week before the workshop. For questions about the hybrid/remote format, contact Mohammed Almutairi at malmutai@nd.edu.

Outcomes & dissemination

All accepted position papers will be published open-access on arXiv. Workshop discussion notes and any synthesized outputs (e.g., a draft Professional Code of Conduct) will be shared via this website and/or OSF after the event. We intend to invite interested participants to co-author a joint publication following the workshop.

Accessibility

We are committed to making this workshop accessible to all participants. Please contact hgs52@cornell.edu for any accessibility requests. You can also reach the CHIWork accessibility team at deia@chiwork.org.

Workshop Code of Ethics

This workshop is designed as a safe, inclusive, and reflexive space. Accepted participants will be asked to commit to a Workshop Code of Ethics that:

  • Protects privacy and confidentiality during discussions and in any publication of materials.
  • Encourages open sharing of negative experiences, ethical friction, AI fatigue, and difficult moments.
  • Respects diverse perspectives on what “responsible” AI use means across contexts.
  • Ensures that personal stories and examples are not attributed without explicit consent.

We especially encourage participants from diverse career stages—students, postdocs, junior faculty, industry practitioners, and senior researchers—and from global and underrepresented communities in HCI.

Questions?

Reach out to Hauke Sandhaus (Lead Facilitator) at hgs52@cornell.edu or Pooja Prajod (Paper Chair) at Pooja.Prajod@cwi.nl with any questions about submissions, participation, or the hybrid format.