Call for Participation

Submit to CHIWork 2026

Join a community of researchers and practitioners mapping responsible AI use in HCI—and co-authoring a professional code of conduct for the GenAI era.

How to Submit ↓

About the workshop

As Generative AI (GenAI) embeds into HCI workflows, balancing efficiency with accountability is critical. The “vibe coding” era and AI-assisted analysis have widened the “accountability gap.” This half-day hybrid workshop at CHIWork 2026 in Linz, Austria seeks to professionalize GenAI-augmented workers by defining ethical “co-thinking,” shifting beyond simple disclosure toward intellectual autonomy.

We welcome both academic researchers with position papers and industry/HCI practitioners with AI disclosure statements. The workshop is designed as a safe, reflexive space where participants can openly share negative experiences, AI fatigue, and moments of ethical friction.

Key deadlines

DateMilestone
May 15May 31, 2026 Extended Submission deadline — Track 1 & Track 2 (AoE) [rolling acceptance — early submissions reviewed sooner]
May 25June 10, 2026 Final acceptance notifications
June 22, 2026 (Monday) Workshop day — CHIWork 2026, Linz, Austria

All deadlines are Anywhere on Earth (AoE).

Two ways to participate

Track 1 — Recommended
Position Papers

For researchers who want to present their work at the workshop. Papers should explore accountability, tool critique, AI dependency, de-skilling, or responsible practice in HCI workflows. Accepted authors get a dedicated presentation slot.

  • Up to 4 pages including references
  • ACM sigconf two-column format (template provided)
  • Light peer review by the organizing committee — not blind
  • Published open-access on arXiv
  • arXiv submission required after acceptance (see instructions below)
  • 5-minute lightning talk + 3 slides at the workshop
Track 2
AI Disclosure Statements

For industry professionals, CHI practitioners, and researchers who want to reflect on and share their personal GenAI use. No prior research required—lived experience is the contribution. A short paragraph is enough; our framework is there if you want to go deeper.

  • 1 page
  • Free format — no template required
  • Extended framework available as a guide (see below)
  • Selected for depth and reflexivity
  • Option to publish anonymously or keep private
Templates

Submission Templates

We provide pre-configured templates for both tracks in the ACM sigconf two-column format (the same format used for CHIWork full papers). Use the Overleaf template to get started immediately, or download the GitHub repo if you prefer to work locally.

arXiv submission

All accepted Track 1 position papers will be published on arXiv—this is our open-access proceedings. The Overleaf template already includes a workshop identification header that will appear in your compiled PDF.

After uploading to arXiv, please email the lead facilitator with your arXiv link so we can list it on the Accepted Papers page.

AI Use Statement Framework

While Track 2 participants are free to structure their disclosures as they see fit, we provide the following thematic framework to guide reflexive accounts of GenAI integration. Move beyond simple disclosure toward a deep reflection of agency, accountability, and “co-thinking.”

Part A — HCI Research & Design Cycle

Characterize your GenAI usage across these phases of HCI work:

  • Planning & Literature Review
    e.g., finding papers, summarizing themes
  • Prototyping & Design
    e.g., wireframing, vibe coding, asset generation
  • Data Collection & Synthesis
    e.g., transcript coding, persona creation
  • Analysis & Coding
    e.g., system prototyping, quantitative analysis
  • Dissemination & Communication
    e.g., manuscript writing, presentations
Part B — Thematic Reflection Areas
  • Agency and Originality
    How do you maintain status as the primary “arbiter” of the final design? Have you noticed shifts in professional identity?
  • Co-Thinking in Development
    Which tasks have you delegated to AI, and which have you reclaimed for “deep work?”
  • Empathy and Quality Integrity
    Describe a specific instance where AI-driven acceleration felt at odds with qualitative depth. How did you verify rigor?
  • Resistance and Re-imagining
    Where have you intentionally rejected AI use for ethical or professional reasons?
  • Professional Policies & Boundaries
    How do institutional standards shape your practice? When do you choose to STOP?
Track 2 Template

AI Disclosure Statement Template

A structured template for Track 2 is included in the Overleaf project. You may also submit in any readable format (PDF, Word, plain text).

Submission process

The organizing committee will review submissions for thematic fit, reflexivity, and contribution to workshop discussion.

  1. Prepare your submission using the appropriate template above.
  2. Export your paper as a PDF.
  3. Submit via the Google Form below.
  4. Track 1 authors: also submit to arXiv after acceptance (see instructions above).

Rolling acceptance: We review submissions as they come in. Early submissions may receive decisions before the May 31 deadline, so you can register for CHIWork 2026 with confidence.

Track 2 privacy: We understand that reflecting on AI use can be sensitive. When submitting a disclosure statement, you can choose to publish it publicly, publish it anonymously, or keep it private (shared only during the workshop).

Submit via Google Form →

Attendance & registration

CHIWork registration is required to attend the workshop. All participants must register for CHIWork 2026 via the official conference registration system. You may choose full-conference or one-day registration.

In-person capacity is capped at 25 participants. Remote/hybrid participation is supported: we will provide Zoom access and ensure remote attendees can fully engage via shared notes and moderated discussion. Mohammed Almutairi coordinates our remote track.

Modality: The workshop is primarily in-person (Linz, Austria), with a dedicated remote cohort. Joining instructions for remote participants will be shared with accepted attendees at least one week before the workshop. For questions about the hybrid/remote format, contact Mohammed Almutairi at malmutai@nd.edu.

Outcomes & dissemination

All accepted position papers will be published open-access on arXiv. Workshop discussion notes and any synthesized outputs (e.g., a draft Professional Code of Conduct) will be shared via this website and/or OSF after the event. We intend to invite interested participants to co-author a joint publication following the workshop.

Accessibility

We are committed to making this workshop accessible to all participants. Please contact hgs52@cornell.edu for any accessibility requests. You can also reach the CHIWork accessibility team at deia@chiwork.org.

Workshop Code of Ethics

This workshop is designed as a safe, inclusive, and reflexive space. Accepted participants will be asked to commit to a Workshop Code of Ethics that:

  • Protects privacy and confidentiality during discussions and in any publication of materials.
  • Encourages open sharing of negative experiences, ethical friction, AI fatigue, and difficult moments.
  • Respects diverse perspectives on what “responsible” AI use means across contexts.
  • Ensures that personal stories and examples are not attributed without explicit consent.

We especially encourage participants from diverse career stages—students, postdocs, junior faculty, industry practitioners, and senior researchers—and from global and underrepresented communities in HCI.

Questions?

Reach out to Hauke Sandhaus (Lead Facilitator) at hgs52@cornell.edu or Pooja Prajod (Paper Chair) at Pooja.Prajod@cwi.nl with any questions about submissions, participation, or the hybrid format.